1.Asseng, S. et al. 2015. Rising temperatures reduce global wheat production. Nature Climate Change, 5(2): 143–147.

2.Basu, G., Bandyopadhyay, P.K., Biswas, S., Roy, A. and Mahapatra, B.S. 2012. Effect of sowing date on growth and fibre yield of jute (Corchorus olitorius L.). Indian Journal of Agronomy, 57(3): 259–263.

3.Biscoe, P.V. and Gallagher, J.N. 1977. Weather, dry matter production and yield. In: Environmental Effects on Crop Physiology . London: Academic Press, pp. 75–100.

4.Board, J.E. and Harville, B.G. 1992. Explanations for greater light interception in narrow vs wide row soybean. Crop Science , 32: 198–202.

5.Boote, K.J., Jones, J.W. and Pickering, N.B. 2013. Potential uses and limitations of crop models. Agronomy Journal, 105(8): 2557–2566.

6.Campbell, G.S. and Norman, J.M. 1998. An Introduction to Environmental Biophysics. New York: Springer.

7.Chenu, K., Chapman, S.C. and Hammer, G.L. 2013. Largescale characterization of drought pattern: A continentwide modelling approach applied to the Australian wheatbelt. Environmental Modelling & Software, 41: 98–114.

8.Craufurd, P.Q. and Wheeler, T.R. 2009. Climate change and flowering time of annual crops. Journal of Experimental Botany , 60: 2529–2539.

9.Evans, J.R. and Poorter, H. 2001. Photosynthetic acclimation of plants to growth irradiance: The relative importance of specific leaf area and nitrogen partitioning in maximizing carbon gain. Plant, Cell & Environment , 24(8): 755–767.

10.Falster, D.S. and Westoby, M. 2003. Leaf size and angle vary widely across species: What consequences for light interception? New Phytologist, 158(3): 509–525.

11.Falster, D.S., Brännström, Å., Dieckmann, U. and Westoby, M. 2018. Plant Form–Functional Ecology and Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

12.Ferreira, L.G., Góes, R.M., Silva, T.S.F. and Castro, J.F. 2019. Remote sensing for crop monitoring. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 80: 1–10.

13.Galmés, J., Flexas, J., Savé, R. and Medrano, H., 2007. Water relations and stomatal characteristics of Mediterranean plants with different growth forms and leaf habits: Responses to water stress and recovery. Plant and Soil , 290(1–2): 139–155.

14.Gardner, F.P., Pearce, R.B. and Mitchell, R.L., 1985. Physiology of Crop Plants. Ames: Iowa State University Press.

15.Goudriaan, J. and van Laar, H.H. 1994. Modelling Potential Crop Growth Processes. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

16.Hammer, G.L. et al. 2019. Crop design for specific adaptation in variable environments. Field Crops Research, 234: 115–128.

17.Hay, R.K.M. and Walker, A.J. 1989. An Introduction to the Physiology of Crop Yield. London: Longman.

18.Hunt, R., 1990. Basic Growth Analysis. London: Unwin Hyman.

19.ICAR-CRIJAF, 2020. Annual Report 2019–20. Barrackpore: ICAR-Central Research Institute for Jute and Allied Fibres.

20.Jones, J.W. et al. 2003. The DSSAT cropping system model. European Journal of Agronomy, 18(3–4): 235–265.

21.Kiniry, J.R. et al. 2001. Radiation-use efficiency in biomass accumulation. Field Crops Research, 68: 199–214.

22.Koch, K.E. 2004. Sucrose metabolism: Regulatory mechanisms and pivotal roles in sugar sensing and plant development. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 7(3): 235–246.

23.Lambers, H., Chapin, F.S. and Pons, T.L. 2008. Plant Physiological Ecology . 2nd ed. New York: Springer.

24.Li, Y., Shipley, B. and Lechowicz, M.J. 2018. Are plant ecological strategies consistent across environments? Evidence from a multispecies test. New Phytologist , 218(1): 272–283.

25.Loomis, R.S. and Williams, W.A., 1969. Productivity and the morphology of crop stands. Annual Review of Plant Physiology , 20: 289–312.

26.Marcelis, L.F.M., 1996. Sink strength as a determinant of dry matter partitioning in the whole plant. Journal of Experimental Botany, 47(Special Issue): 1281–1291.

27.Messina, C.D. et al. 2018. Crop modelling strategies for precision agriculture. Agronomy Journal, 110(6): 1–12.

28.Monsi, M. and Saeki, T. 1953. Über den Lichtfaktor in den Pflanzengesellschaften. Japanese Journal of Botany, 14: 22–52.

29.Monteith, J.L. 1977. Climate and efficiency of crop production in Britain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 281: 277–294.

30.Muchow, R.C. and Sinclair, T.R. 1991. Water deficit effects on maize yields modeled under current and climate change scenarios. Agronomy Journal , 83: 105–112.

31.Nguyen, H.T., Bousser, J., Roumet, C. and Garnier, E. 2019. Biomass allocation in relation to plant size, light, and nutrient availability. Functional Ecology , 33(9): 1645–1655.

32.Niinemets, Ü. and Valladares, F. 2006. Tolerance to shade, drought, and waterlogging of temperate northern hemisphere trees and shrubs. Ecological Monographs, 76(4): 521–547.

33.Niinemets, Ü. 2010. A review of light interception in plant canopies: Physical models and underlying concepts. Annals of Botany , 105(3): 369–389.

34.Paul, M.J. and Foyer, C.H. 2001. Sink regulation of photosynthesis. Journal of Experimental Botany, 52(360): 1383–1400.

35.Poorter, H. and Garnier, E. 1996. Plant growth analysis: An evaluation of experimental design and computational methods. Journal of Experimental Botany, 47(305): 1343– 1351.

36.Poorter, H., Niinemets, Ü., Poorter, L., Wright, I.J. and Villar, R. 2012. Biomass allocation to leaves, stems and roots: Meta-analyses of interspecific variation and environmental control. New Phytologist , 193(1): 30–50.

37.Poorter, H., Niinemets, Ü., Poorter, L., Wright, I.J. and Villar, R. 2009. Causes and consequences of variation in leaf mass per area (LMA): A meta-analysis. New Phytologist , 182(3): 565–588.

38.Rahman, M.S., Amin, M.R. and Hassan, M.M. 2021. Phenological responses of jute to sowing time and climate variability. Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology, 24(2): 101–113.

39.Ray, D.P. and Ghosh, R.K. 2018. Perspective of Jute in a New Realm beyond Sacking, Economic Affairs, 63(4): 981-986.

40.Reich, P.B., Walters, M.B. and Ellsworth, D.S. 2003. From tropics to tundra: Global convergence in plant functioning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 94(25): 13730–13734.

41.Reymond, M. et al. 2003. Combining QTL analysis and ecophysiological modelling to study genetic variability of rice. Field Crops Research, 87(2–3): 85–104.

42.Ritchie, J.T. and Otter, S. 1985. Description and performance of CERES models. In: ARCP Wheat Simulation Modeling Workshop Proceedings, pp. 159–175.

43.Roberts, E.H., Summerfield, R.J. and Cooper, J.P. 1988. Photoperiod and flowering in crop plants. Advances in Agronomy , 41: 1–61.

44.Ross, J. 1981. The Radiation Regime and Architecture of Plant Stands . The Hague: Dr W. Junk Publishers.

45.Rotter, R.P. et al. 2015. Crop–climate models need an overhaul. Nature Climate Change, 5(9): 768–774.

46.Sarlikioti, V., De Visser, P.H.B., Buck-Sorlin, G.H. and Marcelis, L.F.M. 2011. How plant architecture affects light absorption and photosynthesis in tomato: Towards an ideotype for plant architecture using a functional– structural plant model. Annals of Botany, 108(6): 1065–1073.

47.Shipley, B. 2002. Cause and Correlation in Biology: A User’s Guide to Path Analysis, Structural Equations and Causal Inference . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

48.Shipley, B., Meziane, D. and Wright, I.J. 2006. The evolutionary ecology of leaf economics. Functional Plant Biology , 33(12): 1151–1161.

49.Sinclair, T.R. and Muchow, R.C. 1999. Radiation use efficiency. Advances in Agronomy, 65: 215–265.

50.Sinoquet, H., Le Roux, X. and Adam, B. 2001. Analysis of the spatial distribution of leaf area index (LAI) at tree and canopy scales in a broad-leaved forest. Plant, Cell & Environment, 24(2): 195–211.

51.Slewinski, T.L. 2012. Diverse functional roles of monosaccharide transporters in vascular plants: A physiological perspective. Molecular Plant , 5(3): 787–797.

52.Squire, G.R. 1990. The Physiology of Tropical Crop Production. Wallingford: CAB International.

53.Thornton, P.K. et al. 2017. Response of agricultural systems to climate change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 42: 205–226.

54.Tollenaar, M. and Aguilera, A., 1992. Radiation use efficiency of maize under stress conditions. Crop Science, 32: 221–227.

55.Tollenaar, M. and Wu, J. 1999. Yield improvement in temperate maize is attributable to greater stress tolerance. Crop Science, 39(6): 1597–1604.

56.Valladares, F. and Niinemets, Ü. 2008. Shade tolerance, a key plant feature of complex nature and consequences. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 39: 237–257.

57.Valladares, F., Wright, S.J., Lasso, E., Kitajima, K. and Pearcy, R.W. 2007. Plastic phenotypic response to light of 16 congeneric shrubs from a tropical dry forest. Ecology , 88(11): 1–11.

58.Vile, D., Garnier, E., Shipley, B. and Laurent, G. 2005. Specific leaf area and dry matter content estimate thickness in laminar leaves. Annals of Botany , 96(6): 1129–1136.

59.Vos, J. et al. 2010. Functional–structural plant models: A growing paradigm for crop science. Trends in Plant Science, 15(6): 304–312.

60.Watson, D.J. 1947. Comparative physiological studies on growth of field crops. Annals of Botany , 11: 41–76.

61.Weiner, J. 2017. Applying plant ecological knowledge to increase agricultural sustainability. Journal of Ecology , 105(4): 865–870.

62.Westoby, M. and Wright, I.J. 2006. Land-plant ecology on the basis of functional traits. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21(5): 261–268.

63.Wright, I.J. and Westoby, M. 2002. Leaves at low versus high rainfall: Coordination of structure, lifespan and physiology. New Phytologist , 155(3): 403–416.

64.Wright, I.J., Reich, P.B., Westoby, M. et al. 2004. The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature, 428(6985): 821–827.

65.Zhang, C. et al. 2020. Machine learning for crop yield prediction and climate adaptation. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 175: 105592.

66.Zhang, Y., Fincke, B.G., Zhang, K. et al. 2017. Effects of canopy structure and light interception on stem growth and yield formation in soybean (Glycine max L.). Field Crops Research, 212: 170–180.

67.Ziska, L.H., Gebhard, D.E. and Frenkel, C. 2016. Temperature effects on biomass allocation patterns in annual crops. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology , 226–227: 165–173.