Original Article

Feasibility of Different Methods after Debonding of Orthodontic Brackets: An In Vivo Study

Year: 2019 | Month: June | Volume 6 | Issue 1

Juhi Yadav Madhulika Yadav Danish U. Z. Khan Nishi Grover

References (22)

1.d’Ornellas Pereira JC Jr., Weissheimer A, de Menezes LM, de Lima EM, Mezomo M. Change in the pulp chamber temperature with different stripping techniques. Prog Orthod 2014;15:55.

View at Google Scholar

2.Sobouti F, Rakhshan V, Chiniforush N, Khatami M. Effects of laser-assisted cosmetic smile lift gingivectomy on postoperative bleeding and pain in fixed orthodontic patients: A controlled clinical trial. Prog Orthod 2014;15:66.

View at Google Scholar

3.Loewenstein WR, Rathkamp R. A study on the pressoreceptive sensibility of the tooth. J Dent Res 1955;34:287-94.

View at Google Scholar

4.Krishnan V. Orthodontic pain: From causes to management – a review. Eur J Orthod 2007;29:170-9.

View at Google Scholar

5.Takla PM, Shivapuja PK. Pulpal response in electrothermal debonding. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;108:623-9.

View at Google Scholar

6.Haynes S. Discontinuation of orthodontic treatment relative to patient age. J Dent 1974;2:138-42.

View at Google Scholar

7.Brown DF, Moerenhout RG. The pain experience and psychological adjustment to orthodontic treatment of preadolescents, adolescents, and adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991;100:349-56.

View at Google Scholar

8.Kluemper GT, Hiser DG, Rayens MK, Jay MJ. Efficacy of a wax containing benzocaine in the relief of oral mucosal pain caused by orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;122:359-65.

View at Google Scholar

9.Lee-Knight CT, Wylie SG, Major PW, Glover KE, Grace M. Mechanical and electrothermal debonding: Effect on ceramic veneers and dental pulp. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;112:263-70.

View at Google Scholar

10.Boyer DB, Engelhardt G, Bishara SE. Debonding orthodontic ceramic brackets by ultrasonic instrumentation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;108:262-6.

View at Google Scholar

11.Williams OL, Bishara SE. Patient discomfort levels at the time of debonding: A pilot study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;101:313-7.

View at Google Scholar

12.Farzanegan F, Zebarjad SM, Alizadeh S, Ahrari F. Pain reduction after initial archwire placement in orthodontic patients: A randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012;141:169-73.

View at Google Scholar

13.Kokich VG. Do you have an evidence-based practice? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;143:1.

View at Google Scholar

14.Parrish BC, Katona TR, Isikbay SC, Stewart KT, Kula KS. The effects of application time of a self-etching primer and debonding methods on bracket bond strength. Angle Orthod 2012;82:131-6.

View at Google Scholar

15.Cehreli SB, Polat-Ozsoy O, Sar C, Cubukcu HE, Cehreli ZC. A comparative study of qualitative and quantitative methods for the assessment of adhesive remnant after bracket debonding. Eur J Orthod 2012;34:188-92.

View at Google Scholar

16.Elekdag-Turk S, Isci D, Ozkalayci N, Turk T. Debonding characteristics of a polymer mesh base ceramic bracket bonded with two different conditioning methods. Eur J Orthod 2009;31:84-9.

View at Google Scholar

17.Bennett CG, Shen C, Waldron JM. The effects of debonding on the enamel surface. J Clin Orthod 1984;18:330-4.

View at Google Scholar

18.Kinch AP, Taylor H, Warltier R, Oliver RG, Newcombe RG. A clinical study of amount of adhesive remaining on enamel after debonding, comparing etch times of 15 and 60 seconds. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989;95:415-21.

View at Google Scholar

19.Manly RS, Pfaffman C, Lathrop DD, Keyser J. Oral sensory thresholds of persons with natural and artificial dentitions. J Dent Res 1952;31:305-12.

View at Google Scholar

20.Artun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod 1984;85:333-40.

View at Google Scholar

21.Knösel M, Mattysek S, Jung K, Kubein-Meesenburg D, Sadat- Khonsari R, Ziebolz D. Suitability of orthodontic brackets for rebonding and reworking following removal by air pressure pulses and conventional debracketing techniques. Angle Orthod 2010;80:461-7.

View at Google Scholar

22.Knösel M, Mattysek S, Jung K, Sadat-Khonsari R, Kubein- Meesenburg D, Bauss O, et al. Impulse debracketing compared to conventional debonding. Angle Orthod 2010;80:1036-44.

View at Google Scholar

© International Journal of Dental and Medical Specialty | Printed by Renu Publishers. 5988143 - Visitors since June 1, 2015